By Pepper Parr
BURLINGTON, ON December 9, 2011 The Artists and the Bureaucrats met – and the Artists won the more important part of the battle. With any luck the matter will get to city Council and a stupid rule will get re-written or set aside.
The Background. Arts in Action, a collective of artists that hold a Studio Tour once a year that gives the public a chance to see what artists in the city have been doing and an opportunity as well to show and sell what they do.
Burlington stained glass artists Teresa Seaton, took her skills to city halland tried to get the bureaucrats to cut up the bill they had to pay for a license to sell their art. She thinks the Art in Action group might manage to get half the fee they paid back.
The city’s Building Department decided to require the artists to apply for a Transient Traders Licence and charge them fees that amounted to more than $1000. The artists gulped but felt they didn’t have a choice and ponied up the money. Artists, who don’t have a pay cheque never mind the fat pensions that city hall doles out – felt they had no choice.
Artists in Action (and they were certainly in action on this file) complained and after a suitable delay they got their meeting with the bureaucrats. Teresa Seaton, co-chair of the Artists in Action, reports that the bureaucrats had decided before the meeting that “because we were a not-for-profit organization we will have to submit a Transient Trader Licence application two weeks before the event but we will be exempt from fees. Now that the city has the Artists in Action “on file” they get goodies.
Seaton further reports: “As far as being reimbursed the fees paid for the 2011 Studio tour that have already been paid – it will be looked into”. “We came away from the meeting with the impression that we will receive at least half of the $1000. + back. The rest will apparently get kept by the city for “paper work costs”. Someone has to pay for all that paper work and the artists learned that this time they get to pick up that tab.
Don Graves, Burlington artist, helped to get the city to look at the plight of a starving artist a little differently. He got half a loaf.
Seaton reports that she and “her wingman” Don Graves, who attended the meeting with her, chose not to argue that point We did go on to argue that we felt forced by the city to obtain these licences under threat of fines being levied against us.
“It was an interesting discussion with the supervisor at city hall. They are now more aware of the plight of us poor struggling artists trying to “Make a profit”. It is our understanding that a Bylaw review will be done in the next couple years of which we will be advised. As well, they have us on file as an organization that will be consulted as the bylaws are amended.
Seaton adds that: “We fought the cause for every artist with a showing studio in their own residence. According to the city, these artists would still have to pay this licensing fee since they are not known to have a not-for-profit status.
“Basically”, said Seaton “we were left with the impression that what the city doesn’t know can’t hurt you. Although this is not the most advantageous solution it will do until the bylaw reviews proceeds. Seaton promises to argue the case of the poor starving artist more strenuously then. She might push for a full refund of the fees they paid for 2011 as well.
The Artists in Action now feel they won’t have to increase their membership fees and are now going forward with their end of December call for the 2012 show.
